The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph provides information on the population change in three different state of Oregon in the USA over a sixty year period from 1940.

It can be seen from the graph that Columbia had the highest number of population at 75000, whereas the figure for both Yamhill and Wshington were almost marginal at 30000 in 1940.But the population rate in Yamhill was a little higher than Washington.

However, in the following year the population trend in Columbia rise slightly, reaching well over 120000 in 1970, then also it increased dramatically to a peak of 240000 by 2000. When it comes to population in both Yamhill and Washington, it showed an upward trend, which grew slowly and reached 45000 and 32000 in 1970 respectively. Interestingly, the figure improved suddenly and touched a moderate at 90000 and 75000 in 2000. But the figures in Yamhill was always higher than Washington.

To sum up, the population rate in all given states noticed a rising pattern throughout the year in America.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph provides information on t...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... over a sixty year period from 1940. It can be seen from the graph that Colum...
^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...n were almost marginal at 30000 in 1940.But the population rate in Yamhill was a li...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as a little higher than Washington. However, in the following year the popul...
^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation in both Yamhill and Washington, it showed an upward trend, which grew slowl...
^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hill was always higher than Washington. To sum up, the population rate in all ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, whereas, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98214285714 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72298496302 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5847201956 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175539015812 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814132965732 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912205719935 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125088785099 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100181360393 0.0819641961636 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.