The graph below shows the power generation capacity of Germany from 2008 to 2014
The line grap compares five different sources regarding electricity production that German government opted for during a period of 6 years, commencing from 2008. Units are measured in gigawatts.
In general, there was an upward tendency in renewable sources, namely wind and solar, while the opposite was true to non-renewable energy such as nuclear power, coal and oil. Thereby, there was less dependence on non-renewable energy as the main sources of power production.
Starting at around 5 in 2008, the figure of energy generated by solar soared eightfold in 2012, and then continuously rose gradually to nearly 50 in the final year. Similarly, before increasing significantly from a slight 30 in 2012 to nearly 55 at the end of the period, with a surge by 20 between 2011 and 2012, electricity generated by wind power began at over 10 in the initial year, in which wind surpassed coal as the predominant energy sources.
Coal commenced at 30 as Germany preferred source of power, followed by nuclear power at 10 and oil at roughly 5. They stabilized at the same level over a period from 2008 to 2010 before dropping insignificantly to 20, 10 and 5 respectively in the last year.
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 84
- The graph below shows the power generation capacity of Germany from 2008 to 2014 78
- Internet users as percentage of population 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish in a city of Japa between 1980 and 2015 84
- The graph below shows the power generation capacity in Germany from 2008 to 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, similarly, so, then, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9206163733 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2788400604 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152631714164 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643296810951 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324055503884 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889097706567 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316334825857 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.