The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country, namely timber, pulp, and paper from 1980 to 2000.
The line graph compares a nation in Europe in terms of the manufacture of three distinct forestry’s products over a period of 20 years from 1980 to 2000.
It is clear from the graph that during the research period, an instable trend was witnessed in all categories. Additionally, local inhabitants were prone to exploit forests to produce paper and pulp.
In 1980, standing at approximately 6 million tonnes, the number of pulp produced was highest, while there were around 5 million of log manufactured by residents. Likewise, the figure for paper was dwarfed by that of wood, at exactly 4 million.
To 1990, this country saw insignificant growths in the quantity of pulp and paper to 8 and about 7 million tonnes in turn. Meanwhile, the number of timber made underwent a steady increase to the point, at which it shared a comparable figure with that of pulp. In 2000, local people prioritised to exploit forests in order to produce paper with exactly 12 million tonnes. Conversely, there was a slow rise in the quantity of pulp to 10 million, whereas local citizens tended to reduce the manufacture of log with only about 8 million tonnes produced.
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 73
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why Effects on society 84
- The plans below show a small theatre In 2010 and the same theatre in 2012 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8883248731 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78757397795 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3786118869 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221063051064 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915061797525 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608079493293 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139456825066 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645550353547 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.