The bar chart shows the distribution of employment among agriculture services in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the distribution of employment among agriculture, services in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020.

The given bar chart compares three distinct nations in terms of the distribution of employment among three areas over a period of 40 years from 1980 to 2020.
It is evident from the chart that local inhabitants have been more interested in working in services. Additionally, an upward trend has been recorded in all categories, except for the figure for agriculture.
Regarding agriculture, in 1980, the proportion of country B accounted for over 55%, which overtook those of Country A and B by a wide margin, at exactly 20% and approximately 2% respectively. To 2020, the rate of Country B is projected to drop marginally to about 50 %, compared to roughly similar trends witnessed in those of Country A and C to 10% and nearly 1% in turn.
In terms of industry, in 1980, exactly 30% of the local residents of nation A were inclined to work in this area, at which point the figure for this country is predicted to remain unchanged. Likewise, the share of Country B is expected to increase remarkably from 20% to 40% in 2020, whereas that of Country C is forecasted to undergo a slow decline by 20% to over 20%. About the services area, in 1980, the proportion of Country A stood at around 45%, compared to over 20% and 65% of the citizens of Country B and C working in this area in that order. To 2020, there are projected to be insignificant growths in the shares of Country A, B and C to approximately 53%, 41% and 80% respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 381, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...w decline by 20% to over 20%. About the services area, in 1980, the proportion of Countr...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, regarding, whereas, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58139534884 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88818057548 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503875968992 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.2591767713 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280571119441 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112322372022 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10352727772 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175307599077 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129756962048 0.056905535591 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.3001002004 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 381, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...w decline by 20% to over 20%. About the services area, in 1980, the proportion of Countr...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, regarding, whereas, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58139534884 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88818057548 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503875968992 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.2591767713 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280571119441 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112322372022 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10352727772 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175307599077 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129756962048 0.056905535591 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.3001002004 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.