The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The provided line graph represents an overview of the percentages and of four various materials ("Paper and cardboard, Glass container, Aluminium cans and Plastics"), which recycled in a particular country from 1982 to 2010.
Overall, it is clearly seen that recycling of paper and cardboard and glass containers increased after fluctuation; whereas, aluminium cans ascended gradually over the periods.
Almost 65% paper and cardboard materials recycled in 1982 and it increased by 5% after four years. Subsequently, it rose significantly after declined and peaked at 80% in 1994. After 1994, it descended gradually to reach 70% in 2010. Glass containers recycled 50% in the beginning period, but that's rate dropped by 10% after eight years. From 1990 to 2010, it increased steadily to touch 60% in 2010.
On the other hand, aluminium cans and plastics did not recycle in the beginning four years. In 1986, aluminium cans recycled nearly 5%. The recycling rate aluminium cans climbed up step by step from 1986 to 2010 and it was approximately 45% in the end of period. Furthermore, the recycling rate of Plastics were least of position compared to the others three materials and it increased literally to reach nearly 10% in 2010.
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legat requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 67
- Take a look at the graphic and complete the task The table shows average calorie intake in the United States over a period of time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend 33
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take, or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else?What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevan 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Aluminium cans and Plastics', which recycled in a particular country from 19...
^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...cycled 50% in the beginning period, but thats rate dropped by 10% after eight years. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.225 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90819531669 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.3260807089 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261345595179 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104438689192 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747838748393 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159924379489 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815836404248 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.