The line chart illustrates the number of recycled materials in the period of 1982 and 2010.
Overall, there were totally four distictive categories, including: paper & cardboard (which was the type possessing the most optimistic figure), glass containers, alumininium cans and plastics (the one stayed at the bottom). Moreover, they all had increased predispositions, except the first two diminished their percentage in 1990.
During the years shown, paper & cardboard seemed to be the easiest material to recycle that attract an enormous rate over this time with the peak up to 80% by 1994. While platics had its lowest proportion compared to others, modestly 2% and slightly rose to less than 10% in the latest year. At the same time, the datas for the final period of 2010 were respectively 70%, 60% and 45% for the other three. And as aforementioned, paper & cardboard and glass containers dropped their recycling rates in 1990 by 65% and 40% and became the year with smaller percentage for the same type of materials.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for yo 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09580838323 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80854479676 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700598802395 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4288011018 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.571428571 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102750963458 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503793132391 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486444237725 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879781456213 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544684184794 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.