The graph illustrates the percentage of the elderly aged inhabitants from 1940 to 2040 in three different nations namely Japan, Sweden and USA.
At the beginning, Japan had the highest proportion of old people about 8%. By 1960, the population of old people reached exact 10% in Japan. It continued to increase and reached 15% by 1980. But after 1980, it started decreasing and is being assumed that it will increase again only after 2020, and will finish at around 23% in 2040. Sweden started off at around 7% of people aged 65 and over. It followed Japan till 1990,but after 1990, it overtook Japan and the population of aged people in Sweden in 2010 reached 20%. Afterwards, it saw various ups and downs and is assumed to finish at 25% of elderly people in 2040.
USA in the beginning had 5% of old population, but later it decreased and the proportion of aged people by 1980 was about mere 3%. After 1990, the old people population in USA increased very significantly and is being assumed to have the highest number of elderly people, about 27% in 2040.
Overall, all nations saw fluctuations but the old aged inhabitants of all the nation is being assumed to increase by 2040. By 2040, both Japan and USA are assumed to swap their positions and Sweden is assumed to retain its spot.
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 67
- Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the government of richer nation should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such area. 56
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64628820961 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47821114554 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467248908297 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2596519489 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.583333333333 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116324317822 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518585275805 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439478097838 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090281038182 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478550223945 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.