The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line chart compares the rates of people, who are aged 65 and more, in the USA, Sweden, and Japan, from 1940 to 2040.
Overall, the percentage of elderly people is anticipated to increase over the period. Besides, this figure in Japan is expected to overcome the numbers in the USA and Sweden in 2040.
The rates of elderly people increased quickly, in the USA and Sweden, from 9% and 7% (1940) to 15% and 14% (1980), respectively. By contrast, this number in Japan remained below 10% between 1940 and 2020.
Looking into the future, the proportion of elderly people, in the USA, is predicted to climb quickly from 15% (2020) to 24% (2040). After surpassing the number of the USA in 1995, this figure of Sweden fluctuates around 17% before reaching the point of 25% in 2040. Besides, the proportion of people are aged 65 and over, in Japan, is estimated to overcome the figures of two remain countries in 2035 and continuously grow to reach a peak of 27% (2040).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Sakil | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ahmadrava88 | 67 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. Whatcan governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 61
- The chart gives information about UK immigration, emigration and net migration between 1999and 2008. 56
- The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61046511628 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44558823984 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505813953488 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1264591108 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196802142395 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913459983719 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566095321737 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127400234846 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376240522798 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.