The given line graph illustrates the information about people who comes under 65 age period and over.The vertical axis represents the proportion of population and horizontal axis depicts over a hundred years period from 1940 to 2040 in three varied nations of the world.
Initially, in 1940 the population of senior citizens in Japan was very least by 5% and it decreased to 3% in 1960 as compared with other countries. After that, it showed the approximately constant proportion of 3% from 1960 to 1980 but it escalated gradually by 7% between 1990 and 2010.However, it was predicted that the japan population will increase rapidly to 27% in 2040 from 8% in 2020 rather than USA and Sweden.
Furthermore, the ration of aged folks in USA and Sweden was roughly stagnate in 1940 and 1960 and they both increased dramatically almost to 15% in 1980 from 10% in 1960 but the percentage of elders in USA was familiar by 15% from 1980 to 2010 as well as Sweden showed the escalation of 20% in senior population between 1990 and 2010.According the given information the population of Sweden elders will boom in the future by 25% in 2040 as compared with USA.
Overall, it can be clearly notified that the Japan was very least in the population of citizens in past eight decades but it will be very highest in the future as compared with USA and Japan.
- Modern appliances in the home have become more common leaving no doubt that advances in technology have improved our lifestyle Do you agree or disagree 85
- The graph below gives information about how people in the United Kingdom spend their income Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 74
- Write a letter to the Mayor, the head of a municipal government, complaining about a situation in which some adolescents let their dogs run wildly causing danger. 89
- The chart below show the sleep patterns of people in five different occupations to a Canadian study. 73
- Nowadays many students live with their families while others go to another city to study at a university Discuss advantages and disadvantages of both scenarios Include relevant examples in your answer 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... who comes under 65 age period and over.The vertical axis represents the proportion...
^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...d gradually by 7% between 1990 and 2010.However, it was predicted that the japan popula...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stagnated'.
Suggestion: stagnated
...ged folks in USA and Sweden was roughly stagnate in 1940 and 1960 and they both increas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en was roughly stagnate in 1940 and 1960 and they both increased dramatically alm...
^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...A was familiar by 15% from 1980 to 2010 as well as Sweden showed the escalation of 20% in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: According
...senior population between 1990 and 2010.According the given information the population of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... future as compared with USA and Japan.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72151898734 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71190202189 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489451476793 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 22.4926829268 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.829958345 43.030603864 248% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 223.8 112.824112599 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 47.4 22.9334400587 207% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255178881822 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136274877407 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820121699254 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150935207156 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921794839626 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.5 13.2329268293 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.3012195122 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.9970731707 189% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.