The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided line graph indicates the number of transportation ’s goods in Britain from 1974 to 2002 by four different modes of transport, namely road, water, rail and pipeline.

Overall, there is a dramatical fluctuation in the quantities of both goods over the period of 28 years. However, those figures experienced a general rise, which showed a pattern of moderate development in the UK.

Looking into details, road accounted the quantities of approximately 70 million tons as the highest, followed up was water and rail with below 40 million tons and pipeline received a low of around 10 million tons. In the 1974-1978 period, although the number of road, water and pipeline gradually climb, the line of rail saw a downward trend in comparison with that of the other three. Then, there is a substantial vary in the figure of both four goods between 1978 and 1998, which led by road with quantities in vicinity of 90 million tons.

In the last part of the period, there is a significant climb in the number of pipeline with by 65 million tons in 2002. Likewise, quantities of road reached to a peak of 98 million tons while rail and pipeline steadily went up with the figure at about 41 million tons and 23 million tons, respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntities of approximately 70 million tons as the highest, followed up was water an...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, look, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83720930233 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72100576321 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539534883721 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7483443346 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166088077435 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08131923888 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835421604814 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124385544997 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10062487629 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.