The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

The line graph illustrates changes in the amount of goods transported in the UK using four routes such as rail, water, road and pipeline over a period of 28 years i.e. from 1974 to 2002.Units are measured in million tonnes.
Overall, amounts of goods transported by road, water and pipeline show an increase over the period with some fluctuations in between. But the number of goods transported by rail shows a slight increase over the period with many variations in between.
The amount of goods transported by pipeline was just around 1 in 1974 which was the least among other routes of transport. Then it increased continuously until 1994 when it became around 21 and then it levelled off until 2002.The amount of goods transported by water and rail was around 40 in 1974. Then the use of rail as a means of transport showed ups and downs and remained a little more than in 1974, i.e. around 41 in 2002. Whereas the quantity of transported good by water route increased from around 39 to 62 between 1974 and 2002.
The amount of good transported by road was the most among rail, water and pipeline over this period. The quantity of goods transported by road was around 70 in 1974 which the went up to around 90 in2002.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Units
...riod of 28 years i.e. from 1974 to 2002.Units are measured in million tonnes. Overal...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...from 1974 to 2002.Units are measured in million tonnes. Overall, amounts of goods tran...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... 21 and then it levelled off until 2002.The amount of goods transported by water an...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, whereas, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62844036697 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51296193674 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481651376147 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8450381633 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.111111111 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380752198339 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201852099762 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546304408662 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249740855698 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397300441012 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.