The line graph illustrates the number of goods which were delivered by 4 different means of transport namely road, water, rail, and pipeline in Britain over a period of 28 years between 1974 and 2002.
Overall, it is clear that road was the most popular way to transport goods; whereas pipeline was the least popular one. Units are measured in million tonnes.
In 1974, only about 5 million tonnes of products were transported by pipeline compared to nearly 70 million tonnes delivered by road. The figure for road transportation then increased gradually and reached approximately 100 million tonnes in 2002 despite a small drop of around 2 million tonnes in 1996. Meanwhile, the number of goods which was carried by pipeline only witnessed a slight increase of 19 million tonnes throughout the period surveyed.
Both water and rail carried the same amount of freight during the first 4 years, 40 million tonnes. Then the former rose dramatically to 60 million tonnes in the middle years and fell to 50 million tonnes in 1998 before surging up to around 60 million tonnes in the end. However, the latter experienced a fluctuation of under 40 million tonnes during the time shown and finally reached the same amount of freight as in 1974 in the final year.
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 59
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 84
- Computers are increasingly used in education. In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important? 78
- The maps below shoe the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...east popular one. Units are measured in million tonnes. In 1974, only about 5 millio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92056074766 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55272380255 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556074766355 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0549859233 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134289773851 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635868691004 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802167963584 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109670776555 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968622424175 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.