The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980- 2010
The line graph illustrates the number of international conferences hosted in 3 cities namely A, B, and C during the 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the number of conferences in City C increased significantly; whereas City A and B saw a sharp decline in the number of international conferences hosted. Units are measured in numbers.
During the first 5 years, the figure in City C rose sharply from 0 to 20, then it was followed by a slight increase in 1995 before surged to the highest peak at 35 conferences in 2005. However, the year 2005 saw a small decline of about 4, at around 31 conferences, the figure then continued to go down to just above 30 conferences in 2010.
On the contrary, the number of official meetings in City A and B was generally high in 1980, at 35 and 30 conferences respectively. Figures for both cities then fell to their lowest peak at 29 conferences in City A and 20 conferences in City B, they then saw a huge fluctuation between 1985 and 2005. City A witnessed a downward trend to around 24 international conferences, compared to approximately 26 ones in City B in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Phan Phương Minh | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 51 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | simran123 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nferences, compared to approximately 26 ones in City B in 2010.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57352941176 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0622584723 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7873822685 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308878788566 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144681421923 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858076896406 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214985264363 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717848776986 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.