The figure compares goods carrier by various mode of transportation in UK from 1974 to 2002.
Transport by water and rail were having unstable trend over 28 year-period. First, both transports started at the similar level of 40 million tonnes. After 1978, there was an increase sharply in using freighters to almost 60 million tonnes in 1982, but rail transportation declined relatively to 30 tonnes in 1984. However, water carriers and rail carriers increased significantly again in late-1990s, finishing at 60 million tonnes and 40 million tonnes respectively.
Looking at transportation by road, it was the most common method in UK. Even thought, there was a gradual rise in 28 years, a minor unstable trend was happened, there was a minor drop in 1994, but still the first choice of transportation in UK. Interestingly, starting at very low level, the frequency of pipeline increased gradually, levelling off at over 20 million tonnes in 1994.
In conclusion, the rank of goods transport in UK were not changed from 1974 to 2002, but all methods tend to have more usage.
- IELTS Academic Writing 10-3 Task 01The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 73
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025 .Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08988764045 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99429242862 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6794359503 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159937550343 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877887446094 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818593971602 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144934186658 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844545921063 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.