The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates the information of exported and imported items by road, water, rail and pipeline in the UK from 1974 to 2000. In general, product transportation by four modes rose with some fluctuations over the period shown, but the number significantly higher by road throughout the period.
Now turning to the details, in 1974, United Kingdom transported exactly 70 million tones of exports and imports by road. Then, it increased slightly, then fell from 1978 to 1982, then, moved upward for the next 11 years. Thereafter, it got up dramatically with a drop in 1996 and reached its highest point at almost 100 million tones. Similar quantities of goods shipments were made by water and railway in the same period, whilst only 2 million by pipeline. After 1974, water and rail transit increased and decreased sharply. There was a sharp rise, followed by a gradual leap from 1978 to 1988; it leveled off at 60 million tones. It remained the same for over 3 years. Then, a brief dip, then, a rapid rise until 2002, when it peaked at nearly 62 million.
On the other hand, the amount by rail jumped with fluctuations and reached as it was in 1974. Pipeline transportation was noticeably lower compared to the other three transportation modes. But there was a slow improvement over the period.
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club about the club’s activities, facilities and opening hours. 67
- the table below 11
- Modern scientist need specialist in certain fields not in others. Some people think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive 78
- Nowadays most people are not as fit and active as they were in the past. What are the main causes of this situation? Suggest some possible solutions. 84
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86547085202 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72357943456 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62331838565 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4913218469 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4615384615 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142101411453 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469646054557 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393033401656 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10125828148 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272464551832 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.