The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992.
The line chart illustrates comparison regarding percentage of people using either of the two types of media, radio or television, throughout the day in the year 1992.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that radio medium is enjoyed by most of the people in United Kingdom between 4 am to 2 pm (half part of the day) in 24 hours span ;however, television as preferred for rest half of day.
In 24 hours span between nearly 6 am early morning to 1 pm in noon, people mostly listened to radio at the start of the day accounting to nearly 5 percentage of total audiences at 6 am; while, no one watched the tv programmes at this time of the day. From that point of time, percent of radio listeners increased dramatically before occupying nearly 30% of total media consumers at eight in the morning. After the proliferation, change in trend was seen as percent of listeners declined gradually while percent of television viewers surged which resulted in equal proportion of radio and television users at about 15% at one hour pass the noon. From that time of the day, television viewers rised exponentially from 2 pm (15%) to 8 pm (nearly half of survey participants) before reaching peak, then its percent nosedived from 8pm to 2am. On other hand, radio listeners kept on decreasing after reaching peak to its lowest nearly 1% at 2am which is same proportion as tv consumers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010. 67
- emission per person in 1967 and 2007/ 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British Students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010. 70
- Discuss both views and give your opinion. 11
- The maps below show the town of Honeybourne in 1990 and today. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urvey participants before reaching peak, then its percent nosedived from 8pm to 2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67355371901 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72878745815 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557851239669 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9177726261 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.571428571 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5714285714 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218429919994 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103300099622 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578716277104 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166374543369 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028566601235 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.