The graph below shows radio and television audiences through out the day in 1992.
The give graph reveals the percentage of people who listen to the radio and watch television during period in 1992.
Overall, it is evident that the number of radio and television changed markedly throughout the day in 1992. The percentage of television audiences is the highest at 21.00 pm.
According to the graph, there was a slight decline in the number of television audiences by under 5% at 3 am. Then, the proportion of television audiences decreased insignificantly from 4% at 3am to 6% at 9am. This was followed by the period of the exponential growth with the number of television audiences reaching a peak of 45% at 21pm.Unfortunately, there was a sudden decrease in the figure from 45% at 21 pm to 15% at 23pm.
Besides, the number of radio audiences remained stable at under 5% during time between 1 am to 7am. After that, the figure reached a plateau at 25% at 9 am and then fell steadily from the highest rate to 10% at 10pm. On the one hand, there was an enormous drop in the rate from 10 % at 10pm to under 5% at 23pm.
- In many countries, there not enough students choosing science subjects in University. Causes and solution. 78
- what are disadvantages and advantages of having older people living in the family home 73
- some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries bring many positive developments. Others say it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The 57
- The best way to resolve the international enviromental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Unfortunately
...udiences reaching a peak of 45% at 21pm.Unfortunately, there was a sudden decrease in the fig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50264550265 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82911749794 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.801668803 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185757656116 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112631849025 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833483150927 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162860936342 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910488828353 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.