The graph below shows the reason for the use of social media by businesses, by size of business, in 2012.
The bar graph compares the usage of social media by businesses and their dimension for different purposes in 2012.
Overall, we can see from the chart that social media was used by all scale businesses for developing the products and keeping in touch with consumers, whereas for collaboration with other organizations and involving customers were least popular.
In terms of details, businesses with a thousand and more employees used social media more than other sized businesses. For developing business image or market product by a thousand or more workers nearly two thirds used, while all employees and businesses with 10-49 people just above 30%.
The smallest group of employees utilise the social media the least for all purposes, ranging from 10 to 20 per cent. Around 12% of businesses with all employees engaged with social media for employee recriutment, which was the least percentage for this business scale.
For customers involvement in development or innovation of goods/services was the least common way in 2012, when among businesses with 1000+ employees used well under 30%. Collaboration with partners or other organisation was the second uncommon purpose, when businesse with 50-249 and 250- 999 employees were aproximately 15 percent and a quarter.
- Describe a custom from your country that you would like people from other countries to adopt. Explain your choice, using specificreasons and examples. 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 84
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects sho 73
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d their dimension for different purposes in 2012. Overall, we can see from the ...
^^
Line 2, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ganizations and involving customers were least popular. In terms of details, bus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, third, well, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84330793267 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.257575062 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234582245237 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127379673153 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734257958181 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154019384323 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541108768288 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.