The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruit and vegetables sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1979 and 2009

Essay topics:

The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruit and vegetables, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1979 and 2009.

The line graph gives information regarding the changes in the price of three food product groups and the overall trend of the consumer-price index in 30 years from 1979 to 2009.

We can see that the consumer-price index rose steadily from just around 60 dollars in 1979 to reach its peak of almost 210 dollars in 2007 before stabilizing until the end of the period. Sugar & sweet and carbonated drinks appear to reflect the rise in the price of the consumer price index with a constant increase. These two categories started at the same amount of approximately 60 dollars, the price of sugar and sweets was finished in 2009 at a much higher price than the carbonated drink at 200 and around 155 dollars each respectively.

Regarding fresh fruit and vegetables, this category shared a similar pattern with the consumer-price index and other categories despite some fluctuations. Fresh fruit and vegetable price escalated to 100 dollars in 1983 from 1979, followed then by a slight fall to around 75 dollars two years later before heightening again. This pattern was seen repeating several times throughout the period, and its price ended at 325 dollars in 2009 after a meager decline from 340 in 2007.

In summary, a surge in price was seen on all three mentioned categories and as also for the consumer-price index. The fresh fruit and vegetable price saw the most significant changes over 30 years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-04-03 Bryan 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, then, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94936708861 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75083042074 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561181434599 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6786474282 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301620592047 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137695534129 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644459664963 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191606049485 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257705786617 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.