The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph demonstrates how the cost of three categories namely fresh fruit and vegetables, sugar and sweet, carbonated drinks change and consumer-price index change over the course of 40 years, starting from 1979.
Overall, the price of 4 studied categories witnessed an upward trend.It is also evident that for most of the time, the cost of fruits and vegetables registered to be the highest, while the opposite was observed in that of carbonated drinks.
In 1979, the price of fresh fruit and vegetables started at about 60.It experienced some soft ocxillations while having a steady rise before reaching its peak at approximately 340 at 2007. The similar trend was seen at the consumer price index.The figure stood at about 60 in 1979 and displayed a gradual climb to more than 210 in 2009.
Similarly, the cost of sugar and sweet stood at more than 70 in 1979, followed by a significant surge of 130 to hit its highest point of 200 in 2009.Likewise, that of carbonated drinks started at nearly 80 in 1979, which was the most prohibitive among these.The figure demonstrated a noticeable increase before reaching its peak of more than 150 in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2022-03-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | yanping | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | madina6369 | view |
- The charts below show the percentages of readers who preferred to read certain types of book at A Z library in 2009 71
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools How far do you agree with this prediction 61
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ed categories witnessed an upward trend.It is also evident that for most of the ti...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ruit and vegetables started at about 60.It experienced some soft ocxillations whil...
^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...nd was seen at the consumer price index.The figure stood at about 60 in 1979 and di...
^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Likewise
...to hit its highest point of 200 in 2009.Likewise, that of carbonated drinks started at n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ch was the most prohibitive among these.The figure demonstrated a noticeable increa...
^^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing its peak of more than 150 in 2009.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91878172589 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81319961824 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5171921182 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.8 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.4 22.9334400587 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171351080811 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103414533238 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605422516852 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119010519487 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580577856089 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.