The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and
vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and
2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph represents the changes in price between food products and CPI from 1978 to 2009
Overall, it is clear that the price changes of both food groups and CPI have tended to increase during the period shown. Besides, the value of fresh fruit and vegetable accounted for the highest percentage while the figure of CIP made up for the lowest percentage
In 1979,the value of fresh fruits and vegetable remained around above 50 .In the following years , the price changes of fresh fruits and vegetable dramatically rose up to approximately 340 which was the highest point during the period of 30 years
The other’s figures also remained the same as fresh fruits and vegetable ,at approximately 50 in 1979.After that all of the lines steadily increased. Specifically , the price changes of both sugar and sweet and carbonated drinks slowly fluctuated to 200 and approximately 150 respectively ,which was slower than the figure of CIP in 2009
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lear that the price changes of both food groups and CPI have tended to increase d...
^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s and vegetable remained around above 50 .In the following years , the price chang...
^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...and vegetable remained around above 50 .In the following years , the price changes...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... around above 50 .In the following years , the price changes of fresh fruits and ...
^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the following years , the price changes of fresh fruits and vegetable dramatical...
^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d the same as fresh fruits and vegetable ,at approximately 50 in 1979.After that a...
^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
... vegetable ,at approximately 50 in 1979.After that all of the lines steadily increase...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... vegetable ,at approximately 50 in 1979.After that all of the lines steadily increase...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...,at approximately 50 in 1979.After that all of the lines steadily increased. Specifically ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e lines steadily increased. Specifically , the price changes of both sugar and swe...
^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o 200 and approximately 150 respectively ,which was slower than the figure of CIP ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0253164557 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71658678308 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550632911392 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 22.4926829268 231% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 161.684878699 43.030603864 376% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 264.666666667 112.824112599 235% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 52.6666666667 22.9334400587 230% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264621369793 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166195441509 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00768675571808 0.0843802449381 9% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164557550544 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292870869489 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.6 13.2329268293 216% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 27.16 61.2550243902 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.4 10.3012195122 217% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.8 10.9970731707 207% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.