The graph below shows snow depth at a particular ski resort in New Zealand in 2010-2012
The given chart illustrates the average figure for deep snow at a specific ski resort in New Zealand in 6 months including November to April between 2010 and 2012.
Overall, it is evident that the proportion of deep snow in 2010 and 2012 exhibited a notable upward trend while that in 2011 saw a slight fluctuation. Additionally, at the end of the period, the proportion of deep snow was overtaken by the others by 2012.
As can be seen in the line graph, from November to January, both 2010 and 2012 saw an increase in deep snow in a ski resort with 100cm to 150cm in 2010 and over 100cm to under 200cm in 2012. According to February and March, the depth of snow saw a slight increase in year one with around 440cm to 450cm while that in 2012 remained unchanged at 350cm. Moreover, in April, both years one and three had an upward trend with approximately 400cm and 300 cm, respectively
In year two, there was a fluctuation from under 100cm in November to over 100cm in January before rising dramatically to 400cm in the next month. Concerning March, the figure for deep snow remained the same in the last month with 400cm. However, at the end of the period, the snow depth reached a peak of over 450cm in the ski resort, making it the highest compared to the others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-03 | wnhi1010 @ | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dent that the proportion of deep snow in 2010 and 2012 exhibited a notable upward...
^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oximately 400cm and 300 cm, respectively In year two, there was a fluctuation fro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49785407725 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.447164988 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480686695279 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1248441394 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321004388751 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15400958843 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994407950177 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211674249873 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736896438555 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.