The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources (oil / coal / gas) of greenhouse gas in the UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart compares how many carbon emissions three fossil fuels emitted, being measured in million tons in UK from 1990 to 2010.
It is clear that the carbon emissions of gas for two out of the 3 emission sources rose each year, leading to a significant rise in total carbon emissions over the 7-year period. The figure for coal and oil experienced a downward trend in almost every year.
In 1990, the number of carbon dioxides being released by gas stood at around 230 million tons, while oil and coal emitted around 260 and 310 million tons of carbon emissions respectively. Over the next 10 years, the carbon emissions of gas surpassed its partners and rose by about 70 million tons, while the figure for oil and coal decreased to 240 and 270 million tons respectively.
In 2010, gas reached peaks of 330 million tons of carbon emissions. By contrast, the figure for oil and coal dropped to its lowest point, at around 210 and 190 million tons respectively.
- The pie charts below show the greenhouse gas emissions for last year by sector for Australia and New Zealand Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 75
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and g 67
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70588235294 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45933009136 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2696507515 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157378635209 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846282186696 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236209266108 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102244064034 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026099801151 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.