The line chart illustrates the consumption of two different phone services each year in the United States over a period of 10 years.
At the start of the period, the amount of money that residents who use housing phone services paid highest at about $700 in 2001. By contrast, the figures for cell phone services were lowest at just around $200. There was a dramatic change when consumer expenditure on mobile phone services tend to increased considerably by nearly $350 from 2001 to 2006. Meanwhile, the consumption of residential phone services decreased slowly to approximately $150 between 2001 and 2006. In the following years, by 2010, expending for mobile phone services had reached $750, while the figure for paying for household phone services had fallen to around $400.
Overall, it is clear that the chart shows the opposite trend between cell phone and residential phone services during a surveyed period. While users spending more and more on mobile phones, landline almost less popular.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant You should write at lea 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Cambridge ielts 5 page
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07975460123 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59128206595 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.61764608 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375226432697 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171854552885 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990484966556 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223996755679 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943484427861 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.