The provided line graph gives data on the average annual mobile and landline phone used by people in the US from 2001 to 2010. As it can be seen, average spending on cell phones reached a peak in 2010, while average spending on residential phone services decreased dramatically during the given period.
As it is presented in the line graph, between 2001 and 2006, the amount of fee spent on landline phones was pretty high, with almost 700$ and more than 3,5 times the amount of money spent on mobile phones in 2001. During that time, average spending on residential phone services went down rapidly, with 450$ in 2006, while there was a significant rise in the average yearly expenditures on cell phones, with 450$ in 2006.
From 2006 to 2010, the amount of money used in mobile phones continued rising quickly and was higher than used in landline phones. In 2010, the expenditures for cell phones had approximately 780$ and more than most 2 times the expenditures for residential phone services
Words Count: 172
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$700'.
Suggestion: $700
...ine phones was pretty high, with almost 700$ and more than 3,5 times the amount of m...
^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$450'.
Suggestion: $450
... phone services went down rapidly, with 450$ in 2006, while there was a significant ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$450'.
Suggestion: $450
...early expenditures on cell phones, with 450$ in 2006. From 2006 to 2010, the amoun...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$780'.
Suggestion: $780
...tures for cell phones had approximately 780$ and more than most 2 times the expendit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83428571429 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46481195209 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.9705755029 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450697837499 0.215688989381 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23606806598 0.103423049105 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806571860814 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329368204096 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715882917068 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.