The Double line graph demonstrates the amount of recycling rate of waste recovery by million tons in U.S.A during fifty-five years age from 1960 to 2011.
According to the graph the highest collection from total waste was 86.9 million tons with 50% recycling on 2011, and the lowest waste recovery on 1960 it was 5.6 million tons with 6.4% recycled. There is slight increasing in recycling process and rubbish recovery in ten years ago (from 1975 to 1980).
To sum up, the recycling process and waste amount recovery have a significant increasing in last twenty years ago from 1990 to 2011 and the suggested reason was the technology development in USA.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: YS89
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Some people agree that teachers should be strict with their students; others believe that teachers with friendly approach will achieve better results. Discuss and give your opinion. 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The following bar chart gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Wri 56
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison whre relevant. 73
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...f waste recovery by million tons in U.S.A during fifty-five years age from 1960 t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 543.0 965.302439024 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 111.0 196.424390244 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.24586718041 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5285641934 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 64.0 106.607317073 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 156.6 283.868780488 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.2726441241 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366840437022 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230359899218 0.103423049105 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103954037113 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275349440427 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878419586062 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.