The Double line graph demonstrates the amount of recycling rate of waste recovery by million tons in U.S.A during fifty-five years age from 1960 to 2011.
According to the graph the highest collection from total waste was 86.9 million tons with 50% recycling on 2011, and the lowest waste recovery on 1960 it was 5.6 million tons with 6.4% recycled. There is slight increasing in recycling process and rubbish recovery in ten years ago (from 1975 to 1980).
To sum up, the recycling process and waste amount recovery have a significant increasing in last twenty years ago from 1990 to 2011 and the suggested reason was the technology development in USA.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: YS89
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The graph below descibes the statstics rainfall for somecountry 56
- Some people agree that teachers should be strict with their students; others believe that teachers with friendly approach will achieve better results. Discuss and give your opinion. 73
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison whre relevant. 73
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...f waste recovery by million tons in U.S.A during fifty-five years age from 1960 t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 543.0 965.302439024 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 111.0 196.424390244 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.24586718041 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5285641934 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 64.0 106.607317073 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 156.6 283.868780488 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.2726441241 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366840437022 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230359899218 0.103423049105 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103954037113 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275349440427 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878419586062 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.