The bar graph illustrates the proportion of water present in reservoirs in 6 different Australian cities from October 2009 to October 2010m
Overall, it can be seen that, in cities except C, E and F the water levels in reservoirs declined by the end of the period. Furthermore, water levels in City E remained stable during the period.
To begin, in October 2009, nearly 60% of the reservoir of City A was filled. In cities B, C, D and E the water levels the water levels in the reservoir were around 80%. City F had the highest amount of water in it's reservoir during the period at around 90%.
In October 2010, the level of water in the reservoir of most cities deceased. The biggest change was withnessed in the reservoir of City A, declining to around 45%.water levels also deceased in cities B and C, to around 55% and 50%, respectively. Interestingly, the water level in the reservoir of City F remained stable, at about 80%. However, in the case of City F and City C, the figures rose, to almost around 100% and 90%, respectively.
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 61
- Many countries increase the amount of household garbage going to landfill every year What are the causes What can be done to reduce it 87
- In most parts of the world people are living longer What are the possible causes of this situation Is this a negative or positive development 73
- The Graph below shows water levels in reservoirs in Australia 64
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59893048128 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70721363966 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459893048128 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3047814577 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291662672094 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175257566366 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103458480211 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213787284124 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037372844632 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.