The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000.
The line graph provides the amount of investment in studying renewable energies in Switzerland, Denmark, Spain and UK during the period from 1975 to 2000. It’s clear that the Switzerland and Denmark raised investment in studying renewable resources continuously, while Spain and UK fluctuated at a lower level in the research funds.
In the beginning, all nations didn’t invest any money in the filed of renewable resources. Starting at 1075, renewable resources attracted worldwide attention, every nations began devoting money into the renewable resources. In Switzerland, it put the most of money into the research and increased rapidly. In 2000, each person spent 5 dollars in studying renewable resources per year. Denmark was ranked the second of the four nations. Generally speaking, the trends of investment were going up in Denmark, the spending of each person was coming up to 3.5 dollars in 2000, although there was a stopping between 1980 and 1990. The situations in the other two nations were nearly the same. The spending in Spain and UK moved up and down, but both of them never spent over 1 dollar in renewable resources during the 25 years.
Renewable resources is one of the main topic in energy reduction, even though UK and Spain didn’t invest much money into renewable resources at the present time, it’s possible to follow the growing trends as Switzerland and Denmark did one day.
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 75
- Given are two pie charts displaying the categories of the annual spending divided by families in Canada between 1972 and 2002. 78
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009. 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19913419913 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75271578642 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528138528139 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0152873087 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.181818182 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215041215941 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836423931674 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462925506426 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142796955452 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352740525465 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.