The graph compares the numbers of smokers among the two sexes in a place called Someland from 1960 to 2000
The illustrated graph shows the number of smokers among the two genders over 40 decades from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, the quantity of men smokers in Homeland declined gradually while the number of women smokers inclined slightly. However, the number of men smokers still higher than women smokers.
At the beginning of the year, the number of men smokers started at 600 people, the highest number of period, and the women smokers stood at around 100 people. In the next five months, the total of female smokers increased slightly around 100 people while the total of male smokers fell slowly. In 1970, the number of female smokers stood at the same level as 1965 still the number of male smokers decrease slowly. In the next half-decade, male smokers number downward moderately to around 550 people contrary to female smokers that had a noticeable growth of just about 100 people. And then, in 1980, the number of female smokers remained constant the same number as 1975 while the male smokers' trend kept dropping steadily.
The figure for the number of smokers among the two genders in Homeland indicated a sharp reduction over the next half period from 1980 to 2000. Both of them had the same scheme as a trend. However, the number of male smokers was higher than female smokers just about 200 to 250 range of people. Finally, male smoker's rates reached the lowest point at the end of the period meanwhile female smokers stood at 200 people.
- The graph compares the numbers of smokers among the two sexes in a place called Someland from 1960 to 2000 67
- Percentage of Children with Different Educational Problems in Two Primary School 90
- The World Economy Gross Domestic Product GDP by Country in 2018 67
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 67
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...number of male smokers decrease slowly. In the next half-decade, male smokers numb...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80722891566 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19737809868 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429718875502 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9926462636 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280793083896 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13701985067 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103360116303 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234310781628 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112333179655 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.