The given bar chart displays the coffee production in Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia, and in Vietnam over a period of 20 years, starting from 1990.
Overall, all four countries experienced an upward trend, except for Colombia. Notably, Brazil emerged as the leading country in terms of coffee production throughout the provided period.
Upon analyzing the data for greater detail, it can be observed that Brazil produced the highest amount of coffee with about 0.7 million tonnes. During the next 20 years, the amount of coffee made in Brazil peaked at almost 1.9 million tonnes, which was just under three times higher than its starting point. In contrast, despite being the second-highest coffee producer in 1990, Colombia experienced a dramatic drop from about 0.6 million tonnes to just only 0.3 million tonnes during the same period.
Regarding the remaining countries, Indonesia and Vietnam registered the lowest coffee production figures, with 0.2 and 0.1 million tonnes respectively. Over the following 5 years, coffee production in Indonesia remained relatively unchanged, before reaching second place with 0.4 million tonnes in 2010. Meanwhile, Vietnam also witnessed an enormous growth in its coffee manufacture with roughly 0.3 million tonnes in the final year, despite no change during the first 5 years.
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 73
- Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, second, so, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47058823529 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59339207021 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4577598247 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208358242294 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970564567596 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506269557647 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136913513162 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02446542329 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.