The provided table displays oil manufacturing figures in Nigeria, Chad, Congo, and Somalia between 2000 and 2004.
Overall, all four countries experienced an upward trend in their oil production, except Congo. Notably, Congo and Nigeria emerged as the leading countries in this industry.
Upon analyzing the data in more detail, in 2000, Congo produced the highest amount of oil at about 275 thousand tonnes, while Nigeria was the second-largest oil producer, with a lower figure of 205 thousand tonnes. Over the following years, oil output in Congo dropped constantly to end the period at 203,000. In contrast, the amount of oil produced in Nigeria saw a slight decrease to 190 thousand tonnes in 2002 before recovering gradually to surpass Congo as the leading producer in 2004, with 213 thousand tonnes.
In terms of the remaining countries, in 2000, Somalia registered the lowest amount of oil produced with 5 thousand tonnes while Chad provided a negligible amount. By 2004, Somalia experienced a dramatic growth in this industry, ending at 50 thousand tonnes. Meanwhile, there were about 8 thousand tonnes of oil manufactured in Chad in 2003, which was followed by an eight-fold increase to about 50 thousand tonnes in 2004.
- Some people say that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from 5 organizations Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from 5 organizations Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23115577889 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75114499213 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3110560312 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169759715623 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084935316621 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048777564203 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130065876974 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493013234424 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23115577889 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75114499213 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3110560312 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169759715623 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084935316621 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048777564203 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130065876974 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493013234424 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.