The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food (in grams per week), in the UK from 1970 to 1990.
The graph compares the amount of fast food, namely pizza, hamburger, and fish & chips was consumed in the UK in grams per week between 1970 and 1990.
It can be clearly seen that the rate of hamburger and fish & chips consumption grew significantly over the two decades, starting from 1970. On the contrary, there was a dramatic reduction in the usage of pizza in the first ten years while from this point to the end of the period given, that of pizza remained fairly stable.
In 1970, the figure for hamburger was the lowest, which was only about 50 grams per week. By contrast, the proportion of pizza which is consumed reached its highest peak of 300 grams per week, which was three times as much as that of fish & chips. Ten years later, while the amount of consumed pizza experienced a remarkable fall to nearly 200 grams per week, that of hamburger and fish & chips grew considerably, which were 80 grams and 160 grams per week. In the last year of the period given, the expenditure on fish & chips shoot up to 500 grams per week, which was the highest among all three categories. Meanwhile, that of hamburger kept climbing to about 300 grams per week and the utilization of pizza stayed fairly steady.
Overall, there is an upward trend in the usage of fish & chips and hamburger while that of pizza witnessed a substantial reduction.
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The following pie charts show the results of a survey into the most popular leisure activities in the United States of America in 1999 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 56
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6835443038 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43493459899 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497890295359 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8084602157 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302937021386 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141621069961 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107348374548 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17778657028 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145993715504 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.