The bar char illustrates the habits of drinking of people who live in the USA in 6 different age groups from 16 to 74 years old. The consider drinking types in 4 categories (heavy drinker, light drinker, ex-drinker and never drinker). It is measured in percentage.
Overall, the consumption of various beverages has some fluctuations in different ages. In all age groups most of the people tend not to drink any kinds of beverages. In comparison, the consumption of heavy drink are lower than other categories in 16-24, 55-64 and 65-74 ages. Moreover, people in 25 to 54 used to drink and the percentage of these groups are less than other types of beverages.
A more detail look at this bar chart reveals, people prefer not to have drink considerably more some special drinks in 16 to 64 age groups (utmost 60%, less than doubled). About 8% of people between 16 and 54 used to consume some drinks. More than 25 percent of people in 55-64 used to drink. The percentage of people who never drink and who used to drink are roughly the same (almost 45%).
The percent of the citizens in the USA from 16-24 to 25-34 and from 35-44 to 45-54 in light drinker account for 25% and 20% respectively. People in 55 to 74 tend to light drinks and this percentage is slightly more than heavy drinks. In 4 different groups (16-24, 25-34, 55-64 and 65-74) roughly 5% of people are in heavy drinker category and the consumption of these kinds of drinks in 35-44 and 45-54 is approximately same (about 12%).
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's worl 61
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people thinkyounger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace.Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- some people think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe that one can get information from the internet or books. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ent age groups from 16 to 74 years old. The consider drinking types in 4 categories heavy dr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58646616541 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54260991315 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.022775174 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1428571429 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0889154562696 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395462180369 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269580655387 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650986624116 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177859960313 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.