The graph gives information about the technology that households in one us city used for watching television between 2004 and 2014

The line graph illustrates 4 different technology tools (satellite, cable, internet, broadcast) that families consumped for watching TV in a US city between 2004 and 2014.

Overall, the internet usage had an upward trend which was opposite with that from broadcast, internet and satellite. Another striking feature is that broadcast held the major usage at the beginning but it was dropped dramatically later over the period given.

In 2004, the number of households that used internet was slowly rising up to nearly 20. 000 and continued to increase when it soared to be the highest usage amount in 2014, at roughly 170. 000. In contrast, broadcast started on top but then it had a slightly decrease for 10 years onwards until reached the smallest usage at about 10. 000.

Regarding to the remaining types of tools, both satellite and cable showed the upward trends from 2004 to 2008, then hit an opposite difference. As for satellite, the consumption remained unchanged for a short time and kept decreasing steadily to approximately 120. 000 while cable clearly showed a significant decline, became the second minor with about 60. 000 in 2014.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...roadcast started on top but then it had a slightly decrease for 10 years onwards until reached the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, so, then, while, as for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10052910053 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67334554557 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661375661376 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4088154866 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203672046996 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806846407423 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949274868029 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136874042661 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124826672699 0.0819641961636 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.