The graph shows current and predicted trends in the gaming industry.
The given line graph illustrates present and predicted trends divided into four gaming groups from 2010 to 2018.
Overall, it is evident that the number of people spent on gaming increased significantly. Besides, the most remarkable change was online multiplayer gaming which rose sharply during the period shown.
In 2010, those who spent 2 hours on online multiplayer gaming, while multiplayer offline gaming, mobile gaming and solo console gaming were spent around 6 hours, 3 hours and 10 hours respectively. Over the following 4 years, there is no change in terms of online multiplayer gaming and multiplayer offline gaming was two hours and six hours respectively, while the figures for solo console gaming fell slightly to approximately 8 hours. Should this trend continue, solo console gaming might collapse.
Between 2015 and 2018, a significant proportion of time was spent on mobile gaming, reaching the highest point at 10 hours together with online multiplayer gaming climbed rapidly to about 5 hours in 2016. By contrast, there was a slight fall of 4 hours in the amount of time on solo console gaming and multiplayer offline gaming remained steady. In 2018, online multiplayer gaming was also increasing considerably to 10 hours. Should technology continue to accelerate in this way, physical games may become obsolete.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- The graph shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 89
- The graph shows current and predicted trends in the gaming industry 87
- Write an essay about the social and economical impacts of social media 84
- The graph shows current and predicted trends in the gaming industry 73
- Write an essay about the social and economic impacts of social media 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30660377358 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76652853506 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3453572663 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184915951637 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956489471567 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593625956403 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14056568854 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650385521156 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.