The given graph provides information about the yearly salaries of three types of bakeries in London a ten-year period from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, several bakeries' income had given fluctuations in different degrees. Another interesting point is that, Robbie's and Berrie's bakery were collected more salary while lovely loaves bakery dropped dramatically at the end of the period.
Looking at the details lovely loaves were the best bread to eat in 2000 while Robbie and Bernie's bakeries' yearly income was that, the amount of 60,000£ and 20,000£ respectively. For lovely bakery's year were 2004 thus, its income were increased sharply. Afterwards, Robbie's and Lovely loave products were purchased higher rates than Bernie's buns' salary for 2006.
In over a four-year period from 2007 to 2010, Robbie's bakeries' income jumped significantly while earnings of loaves declined rapidly to (60,000£ and 40,000£ from 2005 to 2010). Bernie's buns were bought graduall rates opposite to lovely loaves' salary at that period.That was about 60,000£ in final years.
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of European secondary school pupils learning languages 78
- Transport preferences amongyoung people from different countries 73
- The pie chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- Transport preferences amongyoung people from different countries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bakeries'' or 'bakery's'?
Suggestion: bakeries'; bakery's
... from 2000 to 2010. Overall, several bakeries income had given fluctuations in differ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'loaves'' or 'loaf's'?
Suggestion: loaves'; loaf's
...were collected more salary while lovely loaves bakery dropped dramatically at the end ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...early income was that, the amount of 60,000£ and 20,000£ respectively. For lovely ba...
^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
... was that, the amount of 60,000£ and 20,000£ respectively. For lovely bakerys year w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...rnings of loaves declined rapidly to 60,000£ and 40,000£ from 2005 to 2010. Bernies ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...aves declined rapidly to 60,000£ and 40,000£ from 2005 to 2010. Bernies buns were bo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'loaves'' or 'loaf's'?
Suggestion: loaves'; loaf's
...ought graduall rates opposite to lovely loaves salary at that period.That was about 60...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
... to lovely loaves salary at that period.That was about 60,000£ in final years.
^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...salary at that period.That was about 60,000£ in final years.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45731707317 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48016371963 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7538304558 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.875 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124426728558 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663661450168 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074220368254 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10718343299 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853058000402 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.