The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given line graph illustrates the amount of income of 3 different bakeries in London, including Lovely Leaves, Robbre's Bakery, and Berme's Buns over a period of a decade starting 2000.
Overall, it is remarkable that while the annual earnings of Robbre's and Bemse's Bakery had a tendency to clearly rise in the 2000s, the opposite was true for Lovely Leaves. Furthermore, The income stemming from buying cakes in the Lovely Leaves store significantly fluctuated in comparison with the figures of the two other bakeries.
Starting at about 80.000 dollars in 2000, Lovely Leaves completely outweighed the two remaining rivals, namely Robbre's Bakery and Berme's Buns, which only earned nearly 60.000 and 20.000 dollars per year. After 5 years, despite the unchanged of the position, the gap among incomes of 3 cake stores gradually narrowed, which ranged from 40.000 to 60.000 million.
Then, the year 2006 witnessed a reverse in the leading place regarding revenue between Robbre's Bakery and Lovely Leaves, whereas the earning of Berme's Bakery still reached a bottom at 40.000 dollars. At the end of the period, sharp increases were recorded in the figures of Berme's and Robbre's store, reaching a peak at 62.000 and 102.000 dollars. In contrast, the income of Lovely Leaves continued to drop and finally was only one-second of the initial data.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mes of 3 cake stores gradually narrowed, which ranged from 40.000 to 60.000 milli...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, still, then, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14611872146 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48549512906 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.3325673916 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.875 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104877582117 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491987759641 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373295153222 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724079140681 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220452630877 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.