This graph depicts the average Saturday sales of eight items in two London bakeries, namely Lovely Loaves and Bernie's buns, in 2010.
In general, it was evident that Bernie's buns received a greater amount of customer traffic than Lovely Loaves, which had six more popular items. There was also a noticeable tendency for sweet food to outweigh savory food.
Regarding doughnuts, Bernie's had the highest number, considering the average was approximately 140. Also, the cakes and cookies sold the most with 110 and 115, respectively, being the two best-selling products. Conversely, the savory food received fewer notices since they were all bought by less than 80 people on average terms of the number of buyers. Toasted sandwiches and salad seemed the two more popular with just around 25 and 18 sold in turn.
Turning to Lovely Loaves, even though doughnuts were also the number-one purchase with over 120 sold, it could not defeat the numbers in Bernie’s buns. Cakes and cookies came in second and third place, with around 70 and 65 in turn. This figure was followed by a salad with just over 60, three times as many as were sold in Bernie’s buns. Toasted sandwiches and fresh vegetables had the near number with just around 45. Rolls were the least sold in Lovely Loaves, with about 25 sales.
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 67
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the graph below shows predictions about the numbers of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, regarding, second, so, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95454545455 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35235067943 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5423661715 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771660562949 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331919663389 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633204480464 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076291898595 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951836568421 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, regarding, second, so, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95454545455 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35235067943 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5423661715 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771660562949 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331919663389 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633204480464 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076291898595 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951836568421 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.