The graph given illustrates the number of international conferences in three capital cities from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, city C witnessed a soar in the number of conferences throughout 30 years. On the other hand, the figure for city A and B both decreased after a period of time.
As is illustrated by the graph, in 1980, there was no international conference in city C. However, this city made a big change and steadily increased year by year then overtook city A and B in 1995 to dominate. It reached the peak in 2000 with 35 international conferences and slightly decrease into over 30 conferences in 2010.
Regarding two other cities, city A ranked first at the number of 35 conferences, while city B was the second with 30 conferences. The figure of city A and B continued to decrease before reaching the bottom at 29 and 21 respectively. Both cities fluctuated until city B overtook city A in 2005 at the number of 27 conferences to rank second at 21 conferences. Meanwhile, city A ranked third with a
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: thanhlan0201
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...for city A and B both decreased after a period of time. As is illustrated by the graph, in 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, second, so, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66480446927 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05093409798 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2609976962 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341570806923 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166169644087 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153560217774 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271236161717 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172046060001 0.0819641961636 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.