The graph shows the number of customers at four restaurants between 1990 to 2015
The line graph provides information about average number of people who ate at four different eateries from 1990 to 2015 .
Overall, It is clear that Consumers of pizza was significantly high than other restaurants at that time, While number of customers significantly decreased in 25 years.Whereas, Doughnut Bro and Burger bar had a rapid growth in the given period, while Chicken spot which had many customers in 10yrs , however the next few years had a deep dip in its business.
In 1990, Doughnut and Burger bar sales was significantly low than the other two eat outs, but by next 20 years the sales were doubled approximately 2500 thousands in number. While the latter mentioned restaurants experienced a steep decrease in number of Customers to 2000 .
Meanwhile, Chicken spot which had an average of 4000 persons who ate at place increased to 6000 in the year 2000, while the next few years the sales declined significantly to average of 1000 Consumers in 2015 . whereas People who consumed Doughnuts relatively more and the sales soared up to 8000 thousands of people in 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...our different eateries from 1990 to 2015 . Overall, It is clear that Consumers ...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at that time, While number of customers significantly decreased in 25 years.Wher...
^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...rs significantly decreased in 25 years.Whereas, Doughnut Bro and Burger bar had a rapi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n spot which had many customers in 10yrs , however the next few years had a deep d...
^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by next 20 years the sales were doubled approximately 2500 thousands in number. ...
^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...approximately 2500 thousands in number. While the latter mentioned restaurants experi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... decrease in number of Customers to 2000 . Meanwhile, Chicken spot which had a...
^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tly to average of 1000 Consumers in 2015 . whereas People who consumed Doughnuts r...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
... to average of 1000 Consumers in 2015 . whereas People who consumed Doughnuts relativel...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8000 thousand'.
Suggestion: 8000 thousand
...atively more and the sales soared up to 8000 thousands of people in 2015.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01657458564 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84030266188 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591160220994 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.3699609596 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.333333333 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238950059703 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129325900172 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909283175995 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162502871539 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880128105284 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.