The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992-2000.Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate.

Essay topics:

The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in

Australia between 1992-2000.

Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where

appropriate.

The line graph shows the total daily call times for local, long distance and

mobile calls in Australia from 1992 to 2000.

In 1992 the total time for local calls in Australia was approximately 72 million

minutes per day and this increased by progressively smaller amounts and

reached a maximum of 84 million minutes per day in 1996 before falling

steadily to about 71 million minutes of calls per day in 2000.

In contrast, long distance and mobile call times increased throughout the

period from 1992 to 2000. Long distance call times were around 32 million

minutes per day in 1992 and increased steadily, reaching almost 49 million

minutes of calls per day by 2000. In 1992 mobile call times were at only about 3

million minutes per day but this figure increased at an increasingly rapid rate reaching 10 million minutes per day by 1996 and 40 million minutes per day in

2000.

Overall, the number of calls increased with mobile calls appearing to replace

local calls. In addition, increasing globalisation has probably led to a steady

increase in the number of long distance calls.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-07 Shivam7090 56 view
Essays by user Shivam7090 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... call times for local, long distance and mobile calls in Australia from 1992 to 2...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Mobile
...l times for local, long distance and mobile calls in Australia from 1992 to 2000. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Australia was approximately 72 million minutes per day and this increased by pr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed by progressively smaller amounts and reached a maximum of 84 million minutes ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n minutes per day in 1996 before falling steadily to about 71 million minutes of ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Steadily
...nutes per day in 1996 before falling steadily to about 71 million minutes of calls pe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bile call times increased throughout the period from 1992 to 2000. Long distance ...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Period
... call times increased throughout the period from 1992 to 2000. Long distance call t...
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stance call times were around 32 million minutes per day in 1992 and increased st...
^^^^
Line 17, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed steadily, reaching almost 49 million minutes of calls per day by 2000. In 199...
^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Minutes
...steadily, reaching almost 49 million minutes of calls per day by 2000. In 1992 mobil...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2 mobile call times were at only about 3 million minutes per day but this figure ...
^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...bile call times were at only about 3 million minutes per day but this figure increas...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 1996 and 40 million minutes per day in 2000. Overall, the number of calls inc...
^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d with mobile calls appearing to replace local calls. In addition, increasing glo...
^^^^
Line 27, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Local
...th mobile calls appearing to replace local calls. In addition, increasing globalis...
^^^^^
Line 27, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...obalisation has probably led to a steady increase in the number of long distance ...
^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Increase
...isation has probably led to a steady increase in the number of long distance calls.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04301075269 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50782104178 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440860215054 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0644952248 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 18.0 1.69756097561 1060% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191928094042 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122644140802 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549328358914 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956000286019 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623707635355 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.