The graph shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
The given line chart below illustrates that how many shops in a particular country opened and closed from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, it is clear that, initially opening new stores were prominent which dropped during the period, while the reverse was true for the closure of shops. However, the least amount of stores closed in 2015.
The number of shops that closed fluctuated between 6000-7000 over the first four years and then it dropped sharply to the lowest point in 2015 at 600 only. Its numbers showed resilience and grew back to 4000 over the following year and then remained at the same level until 2018.
Comparatively, the significant amount of shops opened in 2011, whose amount was around 8500. After a dramatic drop it reached to 4000 after a year and then grew back to equalizing with the closure of shops in 2014. This figure declined again to its 2012 level in 2015 and plateaued until 2017 which then plummeted by 1000 at the end of the period.
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 93
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding changes Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74556213018 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27382214509 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0270881443 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296353400135 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116486918474 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855396878859 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171288335911 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825353202146 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.