The bar chart illustrates information about the number of people, who visited different art galleries in 2011. It includes data about the Louvre, France, the Metropolitan Museum, USA, the British Museum, UK, the National Museum of Korea, the Museo del Prado, Spain, and the State Hermitage, Russia.
As is presented in the chart, in 2011 the Louvre had the largest amount of visitors, that made it the most popular gallery, while Hermitage was the least visited.
The Metropolitan Museum and the British Museum were approximately the same at this rate - roughly 6 million, while the National Museum of Korea, the Museo del Prado and the State Hermitage had twice fewer visitors - about 3 million less each. The difference between the number of people visited the State Hermitage and the Louvre was significant. The Louvre was visited 3 times more, than the Russian gallery.
Overall, the distinction between art galleries was different.
- Writing task 2 (an essay)Internet contains a lot of information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The bar chart gives us the information about the life expectancy in Japan ,Korea, United states and Indonesia and the table shows us the change in the life expectancy between 1953 and 2008. 78
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- Writing task 2 (an essay)Internet contains a lot of information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rmitage and the Louvre was significant. The Louvre was visited 3 times more, than t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25165562914 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64491965528 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576158940397 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4382143582 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135435518049 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771970661696 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852935542604 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948993356693 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491084748635 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.