The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012. Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The graph depicts the percentage of number of male and female academic staff members in the faculties of a top university in the year 2012.
The graph takes into consideration seven branches of the university : Arts, Business, Education, Engineering, Law, Medicine and Science.
It can be observed that in the Engineering branch, the percentage of male staff members is the highest(around 82%) as compared to other branches, while female staff members percentage (around 18%) is the least among other branches.
The Education branch has higher percentage of female staff members (about 75%) compared to male(about 24%).
Similary, Arts and Medicines branch's percentage of female staff is greater than male staff.
On the contrary, Business, Engineering, Law, and Science branches have more male staff members.
To conclude, it can stated that the percentage of female academic staff accounts more in Arts, Education and Medicine branches, whereas Business, Engineering, Law, and Science branches have higher percentage of male staff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | AKANKSHA SOHAN NIKAM | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...d to other branches, while female staff members percentage around 18% is the least amon...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 21, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...staff members. To conclude, it can stated that the percentage of female academic ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66242038217 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86532066094 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496815286624 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3846266948 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282179773976 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167879296306 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103123908745 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167879296306 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103123908745 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.