The graph shows the percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features. Write a report of at least 150 words, summarizing the information and making comparisons where relevant.
The given table displays the percentage of numerous functions that mobile phone owners took advantage of between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, all listed features had increased dramatically in proportion. Indeed, phoning, picturing, and messaging were the top frequently used services and experienced a rise over the years. Other functions mentioned in the graph also had a noticeable growth.
The entirety of owners used their phones to contact people in 2006 and 2008, even though this figure dropped 1% in 2010. Taking photos, which was also very common among users, was used by 66% people and moderately increased to 79% by 2010. Likewise, texting started from 73% and slightly went up to 6% in the next 4 years.
Playing games and listening to music shared a similar trend with each other. The former began with 17% and the latter was 12% in 2006. Then, the proportions were almost doubled by 2010. Finally, although the last 2 factors had no figures in 2006, both of them took up the number of 9% and 41% respectively in the following 2 years. In 2010, while the percentage of filming was 4 times higher than in 2006, the proportion of search engine usage was almost three quarters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-09 | ashleyyyyy | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, likewise, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90594059406 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52927666866 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643564356436 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.066229207 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5833333333 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108238312869 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370097698239 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542775722659 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820664869021 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645952127499 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.