The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by kallgou on Sun, 10/20/2019 - 04:02

The chart illustrates data about the Underground station passenger count during different times of a day in London.

Overall, The passenger count fluctuated according to the time with early morning and late night hours have low passengers, while the morning and the evening hours are the busiest.

At 6 am the station opens with 100 passengers and quickly doubles its figure in one hour. The number of passengers rapidly increases to 400 by 8 am. Following this, there was a drastic decline in the people for the next two hours, reaching under 200 passengers by 10 am.Next, the travellers increased considerably till 2pm where the number was 300.

Then, for the next two hours the passengers travelling by metro declines rapidly to 100. Subsequently, the traveller count surges till 6pm reaching a value of just under 400. After that, despite falling to just above 100 at 8pm, the figure increases slightly in the next hour. Finally, it decreases slightly to just under 150 by 22 hours.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 kaka singh 73 view
2020-01-30 benj212 67 view
2020-01-30 gulbakhyt_90 56 view
2020-01-29 tranhien297 56 view
2020-01-29 aria etemadi 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user kallgou :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...station passenger count during different times of a day in London. Overall, ...
^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... am. Following this, there was a drastic decline in the people for the next two h...
^^
Line 9, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Next
... reaching under 200 passengers by 10 am.Next, the travellers increased considerably ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03614457831 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64020413837 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620481927711 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6835948133 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114149505091 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532986109204 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523230014565 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798473099218 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605738305821 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.