The given chart compares the number of travellers going to London Underground station at different times a day from 6 to 22 o’clock.
Generally, the number of people travel by underground in the station fluctuate during the above period, reaching a peak at 8 o’clock. Also, at 6 and 16 o’clock, this figure hits the lowest points.
Starting at a bottom with 100 passengers at 6 o’clock, this figure rises sharply to 400 people at 8 am, ranking first over the 17-hour period. Following that, there is a rapid drop of roughly 200 in the number of travellers from 8 to 10 o’clock. Before declining steadily to hit the second bottom at 16 o’clock, the figure for travellers experiences gradual growth from 200 to 300 people between 10 and 14 o’clock.
Entering the period from 16 to 18 o’clock, passengers go to the underground station climb significantly to nearly 375 people, followed by a decrease to about 125 people at 20 o’clock. Finally, there is a variation around 125 passengers at the end of the period.
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think it is happening How to solve this issue 71
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives Therefore it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that outdoor activities bring benefits to children s development rather than computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to hit the second bottom at 16 o’clock, the figure for travellers experiences gr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85795454545 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9305791515 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4899678933 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137528220814 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774193462465 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425042319091 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109152486222 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279275973844 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.