The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
The graphs contain data about computer ownership by total population as well as by education level between the years 2002 and 2010.
Overall, both graphs show an upward trend throughout the provided year, and computer ownership was directly proportional to the level of degree.
The first graph shows details about the ratio of computer owned by the whole population. In the year 2002 around half of the population had owned computers. After that with a gradual growth the percentage hiked to about 60% in year 2006, which further went to approximately 75% in the end.
The second graph details ownership based on education. In year 2002, least computer was owned by student with no high school diploma, eventually which increased with increase in degree like around 55% by college student, 70% by student perusing Bachelor’s degree and highest by student with Postgrad qualification. A similar kind of trend was followed in the year 2010 also with a minimum value of 40% by no high school diploma student and maximum by postgraduation student (more than 90%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | Binhchuduy | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | quan12341234 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | faztaz | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Government should spend more money on railways rather than roadways To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand Do you agree or disagree 84
- The sales of three different kinds of books between 2002 to 2006 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...nership based on education. In year 2002, least computer was owned by student with no h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12571428571 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67862895176 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588571428571 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9551248889 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336940309515 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167986717848 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158961113161 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261058361405 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186109530914 0.0819641961636 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.