The given bar charts demonstrate data about the percentage of people who owned a computer over an eight-year period from 2002 to 2010 and a comparison of computer ownership according to 5 levels of education in 2002 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graphs is that the higher the education level, the more number of people possessed a computer in both years.
In details, the number of computer owners showed a gradual upward trend from approximately 55% in 2002 to well over 70% in 2010. As regards the computer ownership among the people without a High School Diploma, the figure almost tripled from nearly 14% (2002) to 42%(2010). If we look at the High School Graduates and College Students, they increased by very similar percentages from just under 40% to nearly 65% and from 55% to almost 80% after 8 years period respectively. Regarding the bachelor's Degree and Postgraduate qualifications, another even more identical trend took place. In fact, computer ownership by Bachelor's Degree students increased noticeably from virtually 70% to roughly 90% whilst the category for Postgraduate qualification climbed from about 80% to well over 90% in 2010.
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 78
- The graph shows predictions about the number of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increased noticeably from virtually 70% to roughly 90% whilst the category for P...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, well, as regards, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12565445026 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81791174943 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5824530308 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.857142857 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246995113831 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121051391338 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987171940368 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194030335157 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100280266825 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.