The graphs below provide information about the sales in England of three different kinds of music The graphs together cover five decades and the sales are measured in pounds sterling

Essay topics:

The graphs below provide information about the sales in England of three different kinds of music. The graphs together cover five decades and the sales are measured in pounds sterling.

The bar graph represnt the sales of three different types of music in England, and the line graph give information about music in year 1960's to 1990's.

In begin year 2000 sale of pop music was arround 4.3 billions pounds after it was increased almost 5 billions pounds, But rapidly decrease in year 2002 in between three to Four billions pounds and ti was go little up approximate 4 billion pounds in 2003's.

After that, in 1960's the pop music was started sold and it was sold in 1960's to 1990's in huge ammount. pop music was sold approximate Five billions pound. but the Rock music was sales in England 1960's to 1980's but after this it was started decreased in 1990 and classical music was rapidly go down till the 1960's its sales was down from four billions to near about one millions of pounds.

It concluded, the sale of pop music from 2000 to 2003 was good but the 1960's to 1960' this year was not good for classical or rock music.

Votes
Average: 7 (10 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-21 leoWriter 68 view
2019-04-21 leoWriter 63 view
2019-04-06 leoWriter 78 view
2019-04-06 leoWriter 70 view
Essays by user leoWriter :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...hree to Four billions pounds and ti was go little up approximate 4 billion pounds ...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...billion pounds in 2003s. After that, in 1960s the pop music was started sold and it w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
... music was started sold and it was sold in 1960s to 1990s in huge ammount. pop music was...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pop
...sold in 1960s to 1990s in huge ammount. pop music was sold approximate Five billion...
^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...s sold approximate Five billions pound. but the Rock music was sales in England 196...
^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...in 1990 and classical music was rapidly go down till the 1960s its sales was down ...
^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'one million'
Suggestion: one million
...s down from four billions to near about one millions of pounds. It concluded, the sale of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one million', 'a million', or simply 'millions'?
Suggestion: one million; a million; millions
...s down from four billions to near about one millions of pounds. It concluded, the sale of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'one million'.
Suggestion: one million
...s down from four billions to near about one millions of pounds. It concluded, the sale of po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43103448276 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12563669322 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465517241379 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8207832019 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21996425449 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147669850144 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122341235093 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182491516321 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131708077651 0.0819641961636 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.01 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

I am getting 6.0 here with so much mistakes, can you please tell me how? And how can it judge even without seeing the illustrations?

Although I have many such questions in my mind, still I cannot enunciate my thankfulness to TESTBIG for providing me with such a reliable resource which I never step back from sharing with anyone.